The Israel-Palestine Conflict: A Fight Between Freedom and Oppression
Are Your Beliefs Fueling the Fight for Freedom or Supporting Evil?
Introduction
The Israel-Palestine conflict is often reduced to a simple territorial dispute, but at its core, it represents a profound battle between the values of freedom and suppression, good and evil. To truly grasp the complexity of this conflict, we must engage in mature and enlightened thinking—one that moves beyond the simplistic view of contemporary politics. Understanding this issue requires a deep exploration of the historical, religious, and moral foundations that have shaped the region and the values at stake today. These values include love and compassion, humility, integrity, respect for others, forgiveness, self-control, responsibility, gratitude, justice, and courage. Recognizing these principles is essential to comprehending the deeper struggle between the forces that seek to uplift humanity and those that aim to suppress it.
This is not a matter for those driven purely by instincts, emotions, and feelings; it calls for a level of divine enlightenment that our species and culture aspire to—an expectation that we rise above our basic human impulses. As mature adults, we are called to engage with these complexities thoughtfully and rationally, recognizing that true wisdom lies in discerning the deeper battle for the soul of civilization. At the heart of this conflict is a choice between the values that have built free societies and those that threaten to tear them down.
This struggle demands that we examine our beliefs, challenge our assumptions, and acknowledge that support for ideologies or regimes that suppress freedom and human dignity is a choice that aligns with oppression. It’s time to move beyond simplistic narratives and embrace the call to enlightened thinking, understanding that the fight for freedom requires more than just taking sides—it requires a commitment to the values that uphold the dignity and rights of every human being.
Historical Context: Jewish Roots in the Land
The Jewish people are indigenous to the land of Israel, with their historical and spiritual ties to this region dating back thousands of years, well before the emergence of modern political disputes. The ancient kingdoms of Israel and Judea, established as early as the 10th century BCE, serve as a testament to the enduring presence of Jews in this land. This historical connection is not just a footnote, but a central narrative often overlooked in discussions about the region. It is essential to recognize that Jews originate from Judea, while Arabs trace their roots to Arabia—facts that clarify the distinct historical identities involved in the current conflict.
Judaism, the world’s first major monotheistic religion, emerged around 2000 BCE in this very region, laying the cornerstone for the moral and ethical frameworks that would shape Western civilization. Judaism introduced the revolutionary concepts of one God, justice, morality, and the intrinsic value of every individual—a sharp departure from the polytheistic and often authoritarian cultures that dominated the ancient world. The Jewish belief that humans are created in the image of God instilled a sense of individual worth and responsibility, setting the stage for a moral order that prioritizes human dignity over the whims of power.
Christianity, emerging from the Jewish tradition in the 1st century CE, expanded these principles further, profoundly influencing the development of Western values. The teachings of Jesus Christ emphasized the sanctity of every human life, the protection of the weak, the importance of compassion, and the transformative power of forgiveness. Unlike the prevailing empires of the time, which often thrived on conquest and subjugation, Christianity introduced a vision of society that values each individual as a reflection of divine love and grace.
This shift was nothing short of revolutionary. It challenged the status quo, where human value was often dictated by status, power, or utility. Instead, it championed the radical idea that every person, regardless of their background or circumstances, has inherent worth. These values became the bedrock of Western civilization, driving the evolution of concepts like human rights, democracy, and the rule of law.
However, this foundation is starkly contrasted by the values promoted through later conquests and the spread of Islam in the region. Islamic rule, which began with the Arab conquests of the 7th century, brought a different set of values centered on submission to divine authority as defined by Sharia law. The very meaning of "Islam" is "submission," reflecting a worldview that often prioritizes communal conformity and obedience over individual liberty and autonomy. This clash of values—between the Judeo-Christian emphasis on individual rights and the Islamic emphasis on submission—continues to underpin the cultural and ideological conflicts in the region today.
Understanding these historical roots is crucial because they highlight that the current conflict is not merely about land but about competing visions of what it means to be human and how societies should be structured. Israel, as a modern democratic state, represents the continuation of a legacy that values freedom, equality, and the sanctity of individual rights—principles that are inextricably linked to the Judeo-Christian heritage of the West and have led to the greatest sense of freedom our species has ever known. This is not just a political battle; it is a defining struggle over the values that will shape the future of humanity.
As we explore the Israel-Palestine conflict, it’s vital to acknowledge that this is more than a geopolitical struggle; it’s a battle between two fundamentally different views of human society. On one side, there is a commitment to values that uplift the individual and protect freedoms, and on the other, a legacy of submission and suppression. This distinction lies at the heart of the enduring conflict and frames the broader struggle between freedom and oppression, good and evil, that defines much of the historical and modern narrative in this region.
The Rise of Islam and the Conquest of Judea
Islam emerged in the 7th century CE, bringing with it a wave of Arab conquests that swept through the Middle East, including Judea—the historical homeland of the Jewish people. These conquests were not merely territorial expansions; they represented a profound shift in the societal and legal structures of the region. Under Islamic rule, religion was inseparably intertwined with governance, as Sharia law became the legal foundation. This conflation of religion and state stands in stark contrast to the Western concept of separation of church and state—a principle born from enlightened thinking in the West that recognizes the importance of keeping religious authority distinct from political power.
The expansion of Islamic rule often involved forced conversions and the subjugation of non-Muslims, who were designated as dhimmis—protected, but second-class citizens under Sharia law nonetheless. This legal framework imposed severe restrictions on non-Muslims, as well as on women and LGBTQ+ individuals, suppressing freedoms that are the fundamental ethos to the Judeo-Christian values of individual rights, dignity, and personal liberty. In Islamic societies governed by Sharia, personal freedoms are often sacrificed in favor of communal conformity and religious authority, reinforcing a societal model where submission is valued over individual autonomy.
Islam’s rise introduced a value system centered on submission to divine authority, as reflected in the very meaning of "Islam"—submission. This worldview often prioritized communal obedience and the enforcement of religious law over the protection of individual freedoms, standing in stark opposition to the Judeo-Christian principles that uphold the sanctity of each human life and the rights of the individual. This lack of separation between religion and state means that the legal and moral codes are dictated by religious doctrine, leaving little room for personal liberty or dissenting beliefs.
One stark example of values in direct conflict with Western civilization is the Prophet Muhammad's marriage to Aisha, who was betrothed at six and the marriage consummated when she was nine. This practice, while culturally normative in the 7th century, perpetuates an ethos that can still be seen in some parts of the Islamic world today, where the rights and dignities of women and children are often compromised. This stands in direct contrast to Christian teachings, which emphasize the protection and dignity of the vulnerable, especially children, and has influenced Western laws that seek to safeguard minors.
This divergence in values is not confined to history; it manifests in contemporary issues such as the grooming gangs in the UK involving individuals with Eastern values that conflict with Western ideals of gender equality, individual rights, and personal freedom. These incidents reflect a broader cultural ethos that often clashes with the principles of respect for all individuals, especially women and children, and highlights the ongoing struggle between these competing value systems.
Supporting regimes or ideologies that endorse such beliefs is not just a matter of cultural difference—it is an endorsement of practices that fundamentally suppress freedom and human dignity. The failure to separate religion from law reflects a lack of enlightenment that prevents the development of societies that truly value individual rights and freedoms. This clash of values—between the freedom and equality championed by Western civilization and the submission and control seen in certain interpretations of Islamic rule—lies at the heart of many of today’s societal and cultural tensions. It underscores why embracing and defending the principles of freedom, dignity, and individual rights is crucial for any hope of lasting peace and coexistence in the region.
The Clash of Values: East vs. West
At the heart of the Israel-Palestine conflict lies a profound clash of values between Eastern and Western societies, rooted in the differing principles of Islam and Christianity. Islamic values, which have significantly shaped many Eastern cultures, emphasize submission to divine authority, collectivism, and adherence to strict social norms as outlined by Sharia law. The very definition of "Islam" means "submission," reflecting a worldview that often prioritizes communal conformity and obedience over individual freedom and autonomy. This perspective promotes a societal structure where authority is centralized, personal liberties are restricted, and dissent is often suppressed.
Islamic teachings have historically placed the community above the individual, with strict gender roles that frequently result in the suppression of women’s rights. Practices such as mandatory hijab, restrictions on women’s movements, speaking in public, and limited educational opportunities highlight the broader ethos of control and submission. Furthermore, religious exclusivity is a cornerstone of these values, with non-Muslims often treated as inferior or second-class citizens. This societal model runs counter to the values of freedom and individual rights that are central to Western civilization.
In stark contrast, Christian values, which underpin much of Western culture, emphasize the dignity and worth of each individual. Rooted in the teachings of Jesus Christ, these values advocate for compassion, forgiveness, and the protection of the weak. Christianity introduced the revolutionary idea that every person is made in the image of God, deserving of respect and equal treatment, regardless of their status or background. This belief laid the groundwork for the Western emphasis on human rights, democracy, and personal freedom.
Western societies, built on Christian principles, celebrate individual liberty, rational thought, and the rule of law. These values have given rise to free and democratic institutions, gender equality, and a commitment to human rights that are fundamentally at odds with the collectivist and often repressive tendencies seen in many Eastern cultures influenced by Islamic values. The Western ideal of enlightenment calls for rising above basic human instincts and emotions, encouraging mature, rational thinking and the pursuit of truth and freedom.
This clash of values is not merely a philosophical debate but a tangible influence on the societal structures and cultural tensions defining the Israel-Palestine conflict. The West's commitment to individual rights and freedom contrasts sharply with the values of submission and obedience embedded in the ideologies driving much of the conflict in the Middle East. Understanding this divide is crucial, as it underscores why true peace and coexistence require more than just political agreements—they require a fundamental alignment of values that respect human dignity and freedom.
Supporting ideologies that suppress freedom and propagate hatred, as seen in some extremist factions, is not a path toward coexistence but a path toward societal decay. Diversity without unity leads to division and conflict, where shared values are essential for a harmonious society. In the struggle between freedom and oppression, it is vital to recognize that the battle is not just territorial but deeply rooted in the values that each side upholds. Advocating for a just and peaceful resolution requires a commitment to the principles of liberty, equality, and the inherent worth of every human being—values that have propelled Western societies toward progress and enlightenment.
Critical Thinking vs. Conformity and Submission: The Seeds of Tyranny
Questioning a religion or culture that suppresses critical thinking in favor of conformity is not merely a philosophical exercise; it is a vital safeguard against tyranny. Societies that prioritize obedience over inquiry become breeding grounds for authoritarianism, as history has repeatedly demonstrated. From ancient theocracies that demanded unwavering submission to modern-day regimes that enforce strict conformity, the suppression of free thought has consistently led to the erosion of individual rights and freedoms.
The Western tradition, deeply rooted in Judeo-Christian values, champions the intrinsic worth of each person and the right to question, reason, and seek truth. This has given rise to a culture where critical thinking, the questioning of authority, and the appreciation of individual perspectives are not just tolerated but celebrated. The Enlightenment, a pinnacle of Western thought, emphasized reason, science, and the value of personal liberty—key drivers of progress that have led to unprecedented advancements in human rights, democracy, and innovation.
The contrast with cultures that suppress these values is stark. In societies where conformity and submission to authority are mandated, dissent is often met with punishment, and individual expression is stifled. This suppression not only limits personal freedom but also stifles creativity, innovation, and the growth of ideas that are essential for societal progress. Authoritarian regimes thrive on this suppression, as controlling thought is the most effective means of controlling people. Without the freedom to question and critique, societies stagnate, and the potential of their citizens is wasted.
The Western commitment to critical thinking and individual rights stands in opposition to these oppressive dynamics. By promoting an environment where people are encouraged to think independently, challenge ideas, and engage in open discourse, Western societies have built a foundation that protects against the rise of tyranny. This is not just about preserving a cultural legacy; it is about upholding a way of life that values human freedom above all else.
Defending these Western ideals is essential because they are the bedrock of a society that allows individuals to live with dignity, freedom, and the opportunity to pursue their potential. It is this commitment to the value of the individual—fostering environments where people are free to think, question, and grow—that makes the West uniquely resilient against the forces of oppression.
When a society values critical thinking, it cultivates a populace equipped to recognize and resist the encroachments of authoritarianism. The ability to question and challenge power is not a weakness; it is a strength that protects against the descent into tyranny. It takes courage to stand up for truth, especially in the face of opposition or when prevailing narratives demand conformity. This ethos of inquiry, combined with the bravery to defend individual rights, is what sets Western civilization apart and why it continues to be a beacon of freedom in a world where so many are still subjected to the demands of conformity and submission. Embracing and upholding these values requires not only rational thought but also the courage to speak out against injustice and advocate for the freedoms that define our shared humanity.
Ultimately, defending the values of critical thinking and individual freedom is not just about safeguarding Western culture; it is about protecting the very essence of what it means to be human. It is about championing a vision of society where every person has the right to their own thoughts, their own beliefs, and their own voice. This is the legacy of the West, and it is one worth defending at all costs.
Extremist Teachings in Gaza: The Real Challenge to Freedom
Today, extremist factions within Islam, such as those governing Gaza, actively indoctrinate their children with beliefs that Jews and other non-Muslims are subhuman. Textbooks in Gaza are rife with content that incites violence, glorifies martyrdom, and portrays Jews as the eternal enemy of Islam (Institute for Monitoring Peace and Cultural Tolerance in School Education). This deliberate teaching of hatred and division is not just a regional problem—it highlights a critical issue facing Western societies as well: the naive belief that such deeply ingrained ideologies can coexist with the values of freedom and equality that define the West.
It is dangerously naive to think or believe that importing diversity without a commitment to unity and shared values can lead to anything other than societal decay. This fragmented approach plays directly into the hands of those who wish to undermine the very foundations of freedom and prosperity that define Western civilization. To preserve the freedoms we cherish, it is essential that everyone living in the West upholds the core values of individual rights, human dignity, and freedom of thought and expression. These principles are the bedrock of a free society, and there is no room for ideologies that promote suppression, division, or hatred.
Freedom flourishes when there is a shared commitment to these foundational values; without it, we risk eroding the essence of what makes our societies resilient and prosperous. The challenge is not merely to coexist but to actively uphold the principles that allow diverse communities to thrive in harmony. True progress and societal well-being depend on this shared respect for individual liberties and the dignity of every human.
A crucial component of maintaining these values is ensuring that they are passed down to future generations. Teaching our children the importance of individual rights, personal responsibility, respect for others, and the value of freedom is not just a choice—it is our obligation. Children do not innately understand these principles; they must be taught through example, education, and deliberate guidance. This means instilling in them a sense of agency, critical thinking, and an appreciation for the freedoms that empower them to grow, question, and express themselves without fear.
This involves nurturing their ability to engage with diverse perspectives while grounding them in the core values that make a free society possible. We must teach them to distinguish between constructive dialogue and destructive ideologies, between the freedoms that enrich their lives and the false allure of conformity or suppression. By doing so, we equip them not only to integrate into society but also to contribute positively to its growth and defend it against the forces that seek to undermine it.
For those in the West who struggle to embrace this culture of freedom, it is important to recognize that the issue often lies not with the values of society, but with a personal reluctance to align with them. The challenge isn’t with everyone else; it’s an internal resistance to the ideals that make Western civilization a beacon of liberty and equality. If your beliefs fundamentally clash with these ideals, it may be time for introspection. Enlightenment calls us to rise above outdated or oppressive ideologies and to adopt a mindset that values freedom, personal responsibility, and the inherent rights of others.
Adapting to the values of liberty and equality is not just about fitting in; it’s about understanding that these principles are what protect us all and enable us to live in societies that are just, prosperous, and free. Embracing these ideals is not merely an expectation but a necessity for maintaining the harmony and success of Western civilization. It is our duty to impart these values to our children, ensuring that the freedoms we enjoy today are preserved for generations to come. If you find yourself in conflict with these values, the call is not for society to change to accommodate you, but for you to change and join in the pursuit of a truly enlightened and free world.
Supporting regimes or ideologies that actively suppress freedom and propagate hatred is not an act of tolerance or progressivism; it’s an endorsement of oppression and decay. By rejecting the path of enlightenment, one chooses to regress into a base state of humanity driven by instincts, emotions, and primal urges—forsaking the conscience and rationality that elevate us beyond mere survival. True progress and coexistence require a conscious commitment to the values that uphold freedom, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual. Choosing anything less is not just a failure to advance; it’s a deliberate step backward into the darkness of ignorance and division, betraying the very principles that allow diverse societies to flourish. We must actively choose to be better, embracing enlightenment over regression if we are to build a world that honors the highest potential of our shared humanity.
The Danger of Over-Tolerance: A Warning for the West
The Western ideal of tolerance and inclusivity is often celebrated as a hallmark of compassion and progress. However, when not anchored in shared values of freedom, critical thinking, and respect for human dignity, this virtue risks becoming a gateway to our downfall. Tolerance, without discernment, can inadvertently empower ideologies that are fundamentally opposed to the very freedoms that allow a diverse society to thrive. As the boundaries of inclusivity stretch to accommodate beliefs and practices that undermine liberty and individual rights, we begin to erode the core principles that define Western civilization.
Western societies, built on the foundations of Judeo-Christian values and Enlightenment ideals, prioritize the protection of individual freedoms, the rule of law, and the sanctity of human dignity. These values have fostered environments where innovation, diversity of thought, and personal expression flourish. However, inclusivity that extends to ideologies promoting oppression, suppression of dissent, and the subjugation of individual rights threatens to unravel the fabric of free societies. The line between embracing diverse perspectives and tolerating the intolerable becomes blurred, weakening the very structures that protect our freedoms.
History and current events remind us that unchecked tolerance of oppressive ideologies leads to societal decay. From the fall of Rome, which succumbed in part due to the internal erosion of its core values, to the rise of totalitarian regimes in the 20th century, which exploited open societies to gain power, the lessons are clear: a failure to uphold foundational principles in the name of tolerance can be catastrophic. Tolerance without boundaries allows for the infiltration of destructive forces that aim not to coexist but to dominate and dismantle.
The modern West faces similar challenges. As societies increasingly embrace inclusivity, there is a growing tendency to avoid judgment or criticism, even of those who reject the values of freedom, equality, and human rights. This misplaced tolerance can create an environment where harmful ideologies take root, shielded by the very freedoms they seek to destroy. The result is a slow but steady corrosion of the principles that have made the West a beacon of liberty, progress and the greatest freedoms our species’ have ever known.
The path forward requires more than just open hearts; it demands discerning minds that can distinguish between unity in values and the blind acceptance of all beliefs. True inclusivity does not mean tolerating ideologies that devalue human life, suppress free thought, or seek to impose authoritarian control. Rather, it involves a commitment to a set of shared values that uphold the dignity of every individual and the freedom of all to live without fear of oppression.
Western civilization thrives not because it accepts everything but because it upholds ideals that protect the rights of the individual and promote the common good. The strength of the West lies in its ability to balance openness with critical scrutiny, to welcome diverse perspectives while rejecting those that threaten its foundational principles. It is this balance that has driven its success and made it a model for others.
To preserve the freedoms we cherish, we must be vigilant in defending the values that sustain them. This means being courageous enough to confront ideologies that, under the guise of inclusivity, seek to undermine our way of life. It means recognizing that tolerance is not an absolute virtue when it comes at the expense of freedom and justice. The West’s commitment to liberty and critical thinking must guide its approach to inclusivity, ensuring that it remains a force for good rather than a gateway to its own undoing.
In the end, the survival of Western civilization depends on its ability to remain true to the values that have made it great. This requires not just embracing diversity but doing so within a framework that honors freedom, respects the individual, and upholds the principles that protect us all. Only by maintaining this commitment can the West continue to be a beacon of hope and progress in an increasingly complex and interconnected world.
The Suppression of Free Democracies
Throughout history, Islamic conquests and rule have systematically suppressed free societies in the Middle East and North Africa, dismantling vibrant cultures and stifling the liberties of diverse communities. The flourishing Christian communities of the Byzantine Empire and the Zoroastrian communities in Persia were largely decimated under Islamic rule, as religious and cultural conformity was enforced at the expense of freedom and diversity. Today, the region continues to be dominated by authoritarian regimes that suppress fundamental human rights, with Israel standing as the only true democracy in the Middle East that upholds freedom of speech, religion, and equality.
In countries like Iran, Christians and other religious minorities face severe persecution; conversion from Islam is punishable by death, and practicing non-Islamic faiths is heavily restricted (U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom). In Egypt, Christians have been targeted by extremist violence, and churches face ongoing discrimination and legal obstacles. Syria's ongoing conflict has seen systematic oppression of religious and ethnic minorities, with the Assad regime and various militant groups committing human rights abuses against those who do not conform to their ideologies (Human Rights Watch).
Meanwhile, in Gaza, where Hamas rules with an iron fist, even basic freedoms are denied to its citizens. Women are required to adhere to strict dress codes, LGBTQ+ individuals face persecution, and the media is tightly controlled to ensure that only narratives supporting the regime's agenda are disseminated. This is the same Hamas that claims Palestinians are being oppressed by Israel, while it is their own leadership that actively suppresses freedom and dignity for all but those who toe the line of their extremist ideology. The irony is stark: those who cry oppression are themselves the true oppressors, stripping their people of the very rights they accuse others of denying.
People in the West often remain blind or credulous to these realities, misled by narratives that fail to account for the pervasive suppression and brutality occurring in these regions. It is crucial to recognize that supporting regimes like these is not an act of solidarity or justice but an endorsement of the very oppression and decay they purport to oppose.
True freedom and progress cannot coexist with ideologies that crush dissent, devalue human life, and refuse to recognize the inherent worth of every individual. By turning a blind eye to the atrocities happening today—from the persecution of Christians in Iran to the suppression of free expression in Gaza—we fail to see the true nature of the struggle. This is not a conflict of territory; it is a battle of values, and those who stand with Israel stand with the principles of freedom and human dignity. Those who support its adversaries align themselves with the forces of suppression and tyranny, perpetuating the cycle of violence and oppression in a region desperately in need of enlightenment and liberation.
The Price of Persecution
To truly grasp the stakes of this cultural and ideological clash, one need only listen to the stories of those who have fled from oppression. A colleague of mine, a Christian from Lebanon, shared how she narrowly escaped religious persecution in her homeland. Her older brother barely evaded the regime that sought to suppress their freedom. Stories like hers are a sobering reminder of the real human cost when societies favor submission over freedom. They underscore the broader narrative that this is not just about geopolitical power struggles but about protecting the dignity and rights of every individual.
The Role of the British: Defeating Oppression and Paving the Way for Israel
The defeat of the Ottoman Empire by the British during World War I marked a significant turning point in the Middle East, ending centuries of Ottoman rule characterized by heavy taxation, religious discrimination, and the suppression of personal freedoms. In 1922, the League of Nations granted Britain the mandate over Palestine, with the dual mission of establishing a national homeland for the Jewish people in their ancestral land while also ensuring the development of all communities in the region. This mandate recognized the historical and spiritual connection of the Jewish people to the land and aimed to restore their rights after centuries of exile, persecution, and foreign domination.
However, the British mandate was fraught with immediate challenges, as Britain struggled to balance the conflicting aspirations of Jews and Arabs. Jewish communities, driven by the Zionist movement and their deep historical ties to the land, sought self-determination and the establishment of a sovereign state. Their connection to the land persisted despite repeated attempts by various empires, including the Romans, to erase Jewish identity and sever their ties to their homeland. Notably, after crushing the Jewish revolts—such as the Great Revolt (66–73 CE) and the Bar Kokhba Revolt (132–136 CE)—the Romans renamed the region "Palestine" in a calculated effort to diminish the Jewish presence and erase the historical identity of Judea. Despite these efforts, the Jewish people maintained their enduring connection to their ancestral land, preserving their cultural and religious heritage through centuries of adversity.
In contrast, Arab factions resisted the vision of a Jewish state, not from an indigenous or historical claim to the land, but from a legacy of control established through Islamic conquests beginning in the 7th century. The Arab presence in the region was rooted in centuries of dominance through conquest rather than a deep ancestral connection. Their opposition to Jewish immigration and the establishment of a Jewish state was driven by a desire to maintain regional dominance and prevent Jewish self-determination, rather than any legitimate, ancient claim to the territory.
This resistance was consistently marked by the rejection of numerous proposals for peaceful coexistence. Key initiatives, such as the 1937 Peel Commission's plan to partition the land into separate Jewish and Arab states, were accepted by Jewish leaders but rejected by Arab factions unwilling to recognize any form of Jewish sovereignty. This pattern continued with the 1947 United Nations Partition Plan, which proposed a two-state solution; once again, the Jewish leadership agreed, but Arab states violently rejected it, refusing to acknowledge the Jewish right to self-determination.
Further peace efforts, including the 2000 Camp David Summit and the 2008 Annapolis Conference, were similarly rejected by Palestinian leadership despite substantial concessions offered by Israel. These repeated refusals highlight a persistent unwillingness to coexist and a fundamental clash between values: the Jewish pursuit of freedom, peace, and self-determination versus the Arab factions' desire for control, dominance, and suppression of the rights of others. Their consistent rejection of peace proposals reveals a stark reality—they do not seek peace; they seek control.
The British mandate period, despite its challenges, ultimately laid the groundwork for the establishment of the state of Israel in 1948. Israel emerged as a beacon of democracy, freedom, and human rights in a region dominated by authoritarian regimes that continue to suppress individual liberties. This stark contrast between Israel and its neighbors reflects a deeper ideological divide: Western culture, influenced by Judeo-Christian values, celebrates individual freedom, personal rights, and the separation of religious and political power. Meanwhile, many Eastern cultures, particularly those shaped by Islamic rule, prioritize the collective and often suppress individual liberties and freedoms in favor of religious authority and conformity.
The establishment of Israel not only represented the restoration of Jewish self-determination but also the triumph of values that uplift individual dignity and freedom. Supporting those who resist Israel’s right to exist is not merely a political stance; it is a moral alignment with forces that have historically oppressed and continue to oppress. This resistance to Jewish sovereignty is not about justice or liberation; it is an endorsement of ideologies that perpetuate suppression and control under the guise of resistance.
Enlightenment calls us to see beyond superficial narratives and recognize that true freedom is about the rights and dignity of every individual, not the perpetuation of dominance and oppression. The struggle between these opposing values—freedom versus suppression, individual rights versus collective control—continues to fuel tensions today. By standing with Israel, one supports the ideals of liberty, democracy, and human dignity. Conversely, aligning with those who oppose these principles is to support a legacy of oppression and to reject the values that have allowed free societies to thrive. Understanding this context is crucial in recognizing the broader implications of the Israel-Palestine conflict, which is not simply a territorial dispute but a defining battle over the very essence of human freedom and the rights of individuals.
Moral Equivalence and the Danger of Supporting Oppression
Supporting groups like Hamas and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), or advocating for a two-state solution without addressing the root causes of hatred and violence, is not a path to peace—it is a dangerous alignment with forces that fundamentally oppose freedom, equality, and human dignity. Hamas, for instance, not only refuses to recognize Israel's right to exist but actively teaches its children that Jews are subhuman and glorifies violence against them. The Hamas Charter explicitly calls for the destruction of Israel and the eradication of Jews (Hamas Covenant 1988), making it clear that their objectives are not merely political but rooted in a deep-seated ideology of hate.
These groups often celebrate acts of terror and violence as victories against freedom and democracy. For example, recent attacks on Israeli civilians were met with public celebrations in Gaza, where militants fired guns into the air and distributed sweets to children, glorifying the murder of innocents as a triumph over their perceived enemies. This celebration of violence and oppression starkly contrasts with the values of life, liberty, and the pursuit of peace that underpin Western civilization. Such actions should serve as a wake-up call to those who mistakenly believe that aligning with these groups is an act of justice or solidarity.
Similarly, the PLO has a long history of engaging in violence and promoting the eradication of Jews from the region. While some factions within the PLO have shifted their public stance in recent years, the underlying ideologies often remain at odds with the values of coexistence and peace. These groups and their actions are in direct conflict with Western values of rational and enlightened thinking, which uphold the principles of freedom, individual rights, and respect for all human beings. Supporting these organizations or their causes is, in effect, endorsing the very suppression and regression that stand in opposition to progress and democracy.
A two-state solution can only be viable if there is a fundamental change in how Palestinian children are educated—moving away from incitement, glorification of violence, and hatred, and towards education that fosters coexistence and respect for all individuals. Currently, programs like "Pay to Slay," where families of those who commit acts of violence against Israelis are financially rewarded, perpetuate a cycle of hate and violence. This system, supported in part by international aid, including from the U.S. (Middle East Media Research Institute), undermines any genuine efforts towards peace and fuels the continued suppression of freedom and human dignity.
The notion of moral equivalence—treating the oppressors and the oppressed as if they are on equal moral footing—is not just misguided; it is a betrayal of the values that uphold enlightened and free societies. By supporting or turning a blind eye to these ideologies, one is not promoting peace but rather aligning with forces that seek to undermine the freedoms and rights of individuals. True peace and coexistence require a commitment to the values of enlightenment, freedom, and respect for all people. Anything less is not just a failure to advance but a conscious step backward into the realms of ignorance and division.
To truly advocate for peace, one must reject the false narratives that equate the oppressor with the oppressed and instead champion the principles that promote genuine freedom and coexistence. The path forward is not through appeasing ideologies of hate but through steadfast support of values that honor the dignity and worth of every human being. By aligning with the forces of oppression, one is not standing for justice but rather perpetuating the cycles of hatred and violence that have long plagued the region.
A Warning to Christians: The Danger of Severing Roots
It is particularly concerning when Christians find themselves supporting Palestinian causes that are aligned with oppressive ideologies. Christians must recognize that their faith is deeply rooted in the heritage of Judaism, the original monotheistic faith that forms the bedrock of Western civilization’s values. Severing Christianity from its Jewish roots is severing it from the very source of its moral compass. The Christian values of love, forgiveness, and the sanctity of human life are intertwined with the Jewish understanding of justice, human dignity, and the worship of one God.
Christians who side with those who oppose Israel must be vigilant not to be lured by false narratives that promise peace through the abandonment of these core values. The history of those who celebrate the defeat of freedom is a history of eroding the values that protect individual rights and human dignity. To stand against Israel is to stand against the continuity of the very faith that birthed Christianity. The triumph of ideologies that oppose freedom and oppress others is a direct attack on the principles that undergird both Judaism and Christianity.
We cannot be deceived into believing that Christianity can survive, let alone thrive, when severed from its foundational connection to Judaism. The relationship between Christianity and Judaism is not merely historical; it is a living bond that upholds the principles of justice, compassion, and the inherent worth of every individual. Supporting those who reject these shared values is to side with forces of division and oppression, not with the forces of true peace and justice.
This is a time for discernment, where supporting freedom, dignity, and the values that have led to the flourishing of Western civilization must be paramount. Aligning with those who celebrate the defeat of these ideals is not only a betrayal of our values but a step toward the destruction of the freedoms that both Judaism and Christianity hold sacred. It is crucial to understand that without the Judeo-Christian foundation, the moral and ethical structures that support Western civilization would be at risk.
Christians must be wary of being drawn into alliances that compromise the core tenets of their faith. To support regimes or ideologies that fundamentally oppose the values of freedom and human dignity is not an act of solidarity; it is a surrender to forces that threaten the very existence of those values. The call to action is clear: uphold the connection to the roots that give life to Christian principles, and resist the lure of narratives that seek to divide and diminish the integrity of these beliefs.
Choosing to align with Israel is not just a political decision; it is a reaffirmation of the shared values that form the backbone of Western civilization. It is a commitment to a legacy of freedom, human dignity, and the recognition of every person's worth—values that are essential for the survival and prosperity of both Judaism and Christianity. As stewards of these values, Christians must stand firm against ideologies that seek to undermine the very principles that have allowed their faith and our species’ freedom to flourish.
The Path to True Enlightenment: A Call to Christ
In the pursuit of true enlightenment, it is essential to understand that genuine freedom and dignity are rooted in the truth revealed through Jesus Christ. As Jesus declared, "I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me" (John 14:6). This path to enlightenment invites us to transcend beyond mere human instincts, emotions, and societal conformities, embracing a relationship with the Divine that honors the worth of every soul. This transcendent truth serves as a beacon of hope, standing in stark contrast to ideologies of submission and conformity that diminish the individual and stifle personal freedom.
True enlightenment is not achieved through enforced conformity or rigid submission; it flourishes in the freedom and grace provided by a relationship with the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. This divine guidance calls us to rise above our limitations, seeking not just knowledge but wisdom rooted in love, compassion, and the intrinsic value of every human being. Moreover, it calls us to engage in rational thought and critical thinking, reflecting the Divine nature that encourages us to seek truth and understanding.
Christianity does not demand blind obedience but invites believers to engage their minds, to question, and to seek deeper understanding, knowing that faith and reason can coexist harmoniously. It is this blend of faith and rational inquiry that elevates the human spirit and enables us to confront the complexities of life with discernment and clarity here in the West. Embracing this divine call leads to a freedom that liberates and elevates, guiding us toward a higher understanding of ourselves and our place in the world, and ultimately, toward the true enlightenment that only a relationship with God can provide.
Conclusion
The Israel-Palestine conflict is not merely a territorial dispute; it is a fundamental struggle between freedom and oppression, good and evil. Israel, as a democratic state, embodies the values of individual rights, religious freedom, and equality—principles that are foundational to Western civilization and rooted in the legacy of monotheistic religions. These values have propelled societies toward enlightenment, rational thought, the recognition of every individual's worth, thus paving the way for the greatest freedoms humanity has ever experienced.
In stark contrast, the very definition of Islam means "submission," which inherently runs contrary to the Western ideals of rational thought and the pursuit of enlightenment. Submission, as practiced in many Islamic contexts, often involves yielding personal freedom and individual rights to authority, suppressing the potential for free thought and self-determination. This fundamental conflict in values is at the heart of why coexistence between ideologies that suppress freedom and those that champion it remains such a formidable challenge.
To support a future of peace and coexistence, we must reject ideologies that propagate hatred and submission and instead stand with those who champion the dignity and freedom of all people. True and lasting peace can only be achieved when we address these core issues—when we create a world where every child, regardless of their religion, can grow up in a society that values them as human beings, not as instruments of ideology.
As Jesus said on the cross, “Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do” (Luke 23:34). This serves as a powerful reminder that while some individuals may support oppressive regimes out of ignorance or misinformation, the path forward lies in enlightenment, education, and unwavering support of values that uplift humanity. It is a call to rise above submission to any ideology that diminishes human dignity and to embrace a culture of freedom, reason, and respect for all.
This is not just about choosing sides in a conflict; it is about choosing the values that will define our civilization and the future we want for generations to come. It’s a choice between submission and freedom, between oppression and enlightenment—and it’s a choice that each of us must make with a full understanding of what’s truly at stake. By standing with Israel, we align ourselves with the ideals of liberty and human dignity, rejecting the forces of oppression and division that threaten to tear apart the fabric of a free society.
In this defining moment, we are called to defend the principles that have shaped the most prosperous and free societies in history. We must not be swayed by the allure of false equivalence or the deceptive narratives that seek to undermine these values. Instead, let us reaffirm our commitment to freedom, equality, and the inherent worth of every individual, standing resolutely against the ideologies that oppose them. The future of our civilization depends on the choices we make today—choices that will either uphold the legacy of enlightenment or surrender to the darkness of oppression.